Ain’t it the truth.
Not if one over-does it.
Arguing with a fool proves there are two.
Sadly, we live in an era in which fools have ready access to computers, and will express blatantly misinformed, uninformed, or offensive views, prompting replies. At least I haven’t seen any on this site.
You haven’t gone far back enough in the archives, then. There’s some guy who wrote a novella about how this comic wasn’t dark enough for him.
Ah yes I read the entirety of that comment. He took a lot of time to basically say “This comic isn’t for me and is therefore inferior”
His name was Thatguy, although as far as I know, there’s another Thatguy, and a ThatGUY.
Which strip was that? I can’t remember.
Never argue with an idiot(fool), they’ll drag you down to their levfel and beat you with experience.
I frankly think that it is everyone’s civic duty to at least ensure that the explanation of their opinions is available, but that isn’t the same as trying to get someone who disagrees out of willful stupidity to admit it.
If sarcasm proves ineffective because it was thrown back in the face of the sarcastic person then it might not have been the target of the sarcasm who was stupid. 😛
The words of a wise man.
Throw sarcasm back to the sarcastic person, and they are confused.
Though, now if THEY reply anything at all, you’re both confused…
(does double-sarcasm cancel out?)
Maybe Mille needs a big sign saying “SARCASM” to hold up at such times.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.